“Agenda 2030,” the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the U.N’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF) are nothing new. After reviewing Anna Benn’s Insight Guides-Russia, today’s globalist direction is seen as a place where man has been before.
The SDGs are eerily reminiscent of one of history’s most tragic periods. During the 1930’s Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin successfully utilized forced famines as a method to control the population. Millions starved to death. That this painful point in history has been conveniently forgotten will forever be a stain on the complicit legacy media.
An Agenda 2030 Strategy Designed to Reduce Food Supplies
The U.N. SDGs are “directly implicated in policies designed to squeeze farmers, ranchers and food supplies around the world.” Alex Newman pointed out in his Epoch Times article. High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members and the U.N. helped create the SDGs.They are currently helping organizations implement this globalist plan.
“Left unchecked, the U.N. backed sustainability policies on agriculture and food production would lead to economic devastation, shortages of critical goods, widespread famine and a dramatic loss of individual freedoms.”
Private land ownership is facing increased scrutiny. The needs of the public are being systematically transcended to a higher calling: “To meet the global sustainability goals.” As further revealed by the Epoch Times, the goals adopted in 2015 “build on decades of work by the countries and the U.N.”
The sustainability agenda was the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements known as Habitat I. It stated, “Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals” and that private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributing to social injustice.
“Public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” the U.N. declaration said, in a prelude to the World Economic Forum’s now famous prediction, that by 2030, “You’ll own nothing.”
The Question of Methodology
Two questions emerge. “How could these Marxist-inspired globalists pull off such a draconian objective?” And “How could we have ever gotten to this point where a human population would allow a handful of ultra-wealthy globalist elites to bring such destruction on their lands and peoples? “
We will answer the second question first: “Innocent young minds are easily indoctrinated.”
In Antoli Rybokov’s chilling Glasnost novel, Children of the Arbat, the lives of several young people who had grown up in a Moscow apartment project are recounted. The year is 1934. The promise of future prosperity reigns. Their allegiance to Comrade Stalin and the party is unquestioned. As time passes, cracks, flaws, and contradictions in the Communist ideology appear. Protagonist, Sasha Pankratov serves as the would-be example in illustrating the massive hypocrisies of the system. Pankratov’s dilemma commences with his satirical comment on a wall newspaper photo, at the institute where he was in his final year. Without warning, he is expelled, subsequently reinstated, and later imprisoned by an overly zealous, paranoid CHEKA. His academic peers at the Institute accused Pankratov of harboring Trotskyite inclinations, The comment suggested that he was questioning party methodology. Overnight he went from an aspiring young Engineer to unfit for the Institute and unfit for Moscow residency.
It begins with Academia. In 2021 I attended the University of Kentucky’s left-leaning, “Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce.” In a U.S.-Russian Relations” course, I was abruptly stopped in the middle of my “Cultural Relations” presentation by instructor, Carey Cavanaugh. I was unveiling a rarely-heard revelation made by an unlikely group of people in a place most Americans had never heard of.
In 1998 I visited Krasnoyarsk, a large Siberian city that was closed to the west prior to 1996. There I met with six young Russians. All had college degrees. All but one spoke English. I was asked somewhat matter-of-factly, “Why did your government interfere with our revolution?” A copy of a one-million-dollar bank draft drawn from J.P. Morgan made payable to an organization associated with the Bolsheviks, was produced. I later verified the document’s authenticity.
There were two revolutions in Russia in 1917. The first revolution saw Tsar Nicholas II abdicate to a peaceful democratic effort that was quickly pushed aside by Vladimir Lenin and 60,000 Bolshevik believers. They were fueled by what turned out to be a one-million-dollar loan from J.P. Morgan.
My answer of “J.P. Morgan is a private bank and does not represent the United States government” seemed shallow and naïve. As my hosts, these Russians were polite, but I could tell that they were not buying this explanation.,
Cavanaugh, a former U.S. Ambassador, rudely interrupted my presentation, proclaiming that “nobody cares about that anymore.”
Academia is Clearly Partisan
Originally appointed by President Bill Clinton, and a staunch supporter of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Cavanaugh later accused me of “taking the class in a different direction.” Yet following my presentation, four of my classmates, all decades my junior (There were ten students in the class including myself), made it a point to congratulate me on my presentation.
Such defiance can often prove detrimental! “There are kids in America who have had their admissions to colleges revoked because of something that they said, or supposedly said, when they were 14 years old. There are certain things that you can’t say on a college campus,” Florida Senator, Marco Rubio admitted at the 2022 CPAC convention.
The result: Tens of thousands of brainwashed, strategically indoctrinated young people emerge from colleges and universities every year! It is a modern-day, “Children of the Arbat!”
The question is, “Why is the country tolerating such partisanship at federal land grant institutions?”
The Green New Deal Ruse
The first question is easier to understand. The “Green New Deal” will later be remembered as the greatest hoax ever implemented. The goal is control. A proven method of controlling a populace is to starve them into submission. Joseph Stalin could attest to it.
Experts interviewed by the Epoch Times say that “the world’s wealthiest and most powerful corporate leaders are working with Communists in China and elsewhere to centralize control over food production and crush independent farmers and ranchers.” They warn that the “sustainability” narrative is a tool to gain control over food, agriculture, and people.
According to Steve Burnett, director of Climate and Environmental Policy at Heartland Institute, “It’s not a war on farming, it’s a war on small farming and independent farmers. It’s a war in support of the elite, large-scale agricultural industries.”
“The end goal is to reduce the sovereignty of both individual nations and people,” Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow President, Craig Rucker related. CFACT is a public policy organization that specializes in environmental development issues.
“The intent for those pushing this agenda is not to save the planet, as they purport, but to increase control over the people,” Rucker added, emphasizing that the goal was to centralize power at both national and international levels.
The tool of these U.N. agencies has been to implement sustainability goals in agriculture and other sectors. The European Union’s “Natura 2000” and the E.U. Biodiversity Strategy for 2030,” were cited by the Dutch government in their agricultural policies. They describe it as a “public-private partnership.”
Cleverly hidden and at the heart of the effort is what the World Economic Forum describes as a total transformation of society known as the “Great Reset.” It has been dubbed the “Strategic Partnership.”
The official agreement defined “areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement to jointly accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030 for sustainable development.”
Stalin called his vision, “the five-year plan.”
Many in leadership roles are indoctrinated to the extent that they don’t take issue with what was once readily noticeable. Decades of revisionist history, spearheaded by partisan, Stalinist academicians have created a severely obtuse population of future leaders.
“A lot of people are Marxists and don’t even know it,” Rubio added.
In short, Marxists are craftily using the Green New Deal as a mechanism to slip Communism through the back door.
Should intentionally starving massive populations be viewed as a “crime against humanity?” If so, wouldn’t this place those behind these policies in violation of the “Nuremberg Code” statutes?
The question becomes, “Who gave these global elites the right to determine who lives and who doesn’t?”
