Skeptical Americans are becoming increasingly sardonic. When a potentially ground-changing case (Brunson v. Adams) docketed by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is ignored by the corporate media, suspicions arise.

The case before SCOTUS on Jan 6, is Docket 22-380: Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. What it signifies has only surfaced once in American history, with the disputed Presidential election of 1876. The Brunson v. Adams case takes it one step further.

Scarcely two years ago, brothers Loy and Raland Brunson took exception to the majority of U.S. Senators and Congressmen’s refusal to heed the plea of 100 of their colleagues. The 100 Congressmen and Senators contended that the contested election of 2020 merited investigation.

The case described on the Monomakhos website has been added to the Supreme Court’s emergency docket. The court pleadings are as follows:

• The case involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with 385 members of the United States Congress.
• Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, seeking to destroy the Constitution of the United States of America.
• The case alleges that Congress failed in its constitutional duties by ignoring the protection of critical infrastructure (election systems) during a National Emergency.
• US courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates everything (US v Throckmorton, 1878).
• The refusal of the respondents to investigate the Congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by the respondents.
• The successful manipulation of US elections constitutes an act of war.

Brunson v. Adams Ignored by the Mainstream Media

Brunson v. Adams has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. The Highland County Press in Hillsboro, Ohio stated, “It was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. congressmen and 94 U.S. senators who voted to certify the electors to the Electoral College on Jan. 6, 2021, without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud that allegedly took place in six states. There are also allegations of foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 presidential election.”

The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. The case is now scheduled for SCOTUS hearing on Jan. 6. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.         

Why Now, Two Years After the Fact?

As Barry A. Zauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the intelligence community concluded at the time, the intelligence community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6 Electoral College certification by Congress, because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration.

This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and the U.S. Intelligence agencies to cover up evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason.

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim that the election was stolen. Its complaint centers around 385 Congressmen and Senators who failed to investigate serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security. This violated their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. This Oath was also taken by the Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

During the October 25 interview, Loy Brunson summarized his motivation. He simply wanted clarification explaining why 291 Congressmen and 94 Senators did not consider the complaints of their colleagues sufficiently significant to merit to an investigation, considering the potential adversary.  

A cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis has surfaced in recent weeks. It could be difficult to resolve the emerging crisis without the court’s intervention.

What Really Happened?

The Brunson lawsuit argues that all of Congress was put on notice prior to its Jan. 6 vote. More than a hundred of its own members came forth with serious allegations of election fraud. They called for the creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations, a la 1876. The Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required by executive order and Congress itself, to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 presidential election by Dec. 18, 2020.

Dec. 18 came and went without ODNI submitting its report. This failure should have energized Congress to ask questions and investigate, but perhaps fearing the eventual findings, Congress did not act.

On that same day, DNI John Ratcliffe announced that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were divided on the overall significance and whether a breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the election. Much of the captured intelligence was written in Mandarin, requiring a delay in translation. The Trump administration accused the ODNI of “slow walking” the report.

Best Swept Under the Rug

In a recent Epoch Times article, Jeffrey Tucker, President of Brownstone Institute defined gaslighting as “extended psychological trickery to cause the victim to question his or her own reality.”

Under the pretense of protecting Democracy, those not on board with the narrative are marginalized and subsequently erased. This is how tyranny is created.

Yet an oath is not a joke. It’s the overall foundation of the Republic and should be looked upon as such. Because they are entrusted with creating the laws of the land, congressmen and senators, not to mention the president and vice president, should be held to the highest standard.

Supreme Court justices likely recognize these approaching storm clouds. They may conclude that the court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. 

---

The Maverick Observer is an online free-thinking publication interested in the happenings in our region. We promote open views without bias. All views are welcome – it is how we learn from each other and grow as a community.

---